This one is a little late, I know. The reason is that I had to think long and hard about what I genuinely thought about the mobile phone technology on display at CES this year. If you read the tech blogs then the majority seem to think that this was the year of Windows Phone 7. The usual suspects were fighting for their own corner, either praising or degrading Android depending on their faction.
It’s tough for me because I am a fully paid up member of the iPhone fanatic faction. Obviously Apple had zero presence at CES and so this should make me pretty unbiased right? Of course it doesn’t, I have, in the past, used both Android and WP7 phones – I have written my opinions of those phones on several other blogs and tweets and posts. Generally it comes to this, I don’t like Android, I think WP7 has a great future, I love bacon.
You’re probably wondering how bacon comes into the equation, I could probably lie and tell you that i’ll explain it later in the hope that i’ll keep you interested to the end, but in reality bacon represents Apple – who I can’t mention anymore in this, because they weren’t at CES. Also i’m slightly hungry.
The phones, there were more than two Phone operating systems on display at CES, but in reality there were only two that people cared about (by people I mean me), Android and WP7.
Android has exploded in the last couple of years. The sheer breadth of devices it’s present on means that there is genuinely an Android toy for any price bracket – hell I recently bought a fairly usable tablet for £46 (about $79) from http://www.chinabuye.com just to have something to play on. Because of this range Android has quickly become the leader in the Smartphone OS pack – but with a large range of devices comes the fragmentation problem. Google may want to pretend it doesn’t exist but simply put, that phone/tablet you buy today could well stop being updated a long time before it’s effective use it over, simply because of how hard it is to keep upgrades to the OS ported to every device. But then when you’re paying about 50 pence for a phone, who cares?
Windows Phone 7 is Microsofts attempt to escape the best forgotten past of Windows Mobile. Fortunately they realised that putting a mini windows desktop on a phone just made a really hard to use phone without giving any of the benefits of a full size windows desktop. The new OS has the Metro interface which is pretty neat, pretty pretty and pretty fast. Microsofts problem is that it’s about 2 years late to the party, the initial version of the OS (the one which should have got the customers excited) was missing some pretty major functionality (cut and paste, multitasking) and it has to get over the fairly bad image it has in the phone market and, in fact, the world all over.
How about we start by listing some of the highlight phones for each OS?
Android |
||||
| Model | Droid RAZR Maxx | |||
| Manufacturer | Motorola | Another phone in the near legendary Droid family of phones. This one comes in with a slightly thicker chassis but with a potentially thunder stealing battery life. | ||
| Screen Size | 4.3 inches | |||
| Processor | 1.2Ghz 2 Core | |||
| Storage | 32GB and microSD max 32GB | |||
| Memory | 1GB | |||
| OS | Android 2.3.5 | |||
| Key Feature | Estimated 21 hours of talktime | |||
| Availability | Q2/Q3 2012 | |||
| Price | Less than $300 | |||
| Review | The Verge | |||
| Model | Xperia Ion | |||
| Manufacturer | Sony | With a large screen, slimline looks and a stunning rear camera the Ion has strong basics, but Sony are hoping the addition of Playstation compatibility and built-in streaming to a wide variety of receivers including DLNA support will swing it with the media crowd. | ||
| Screen Size | 4.6 inches | |||
| Processor | 1.5Ghz 2 Core | |||
| Storage | 8GB and microSD max 32GB | |||
| Memory | 1GB | |||
| OS | Android 2.3.7 | |||
| Key Feature | 12mp camera and Playstation support | |||
| Availability | Q2/Q3 2012 | |||
| Price | Less than $300 | |||
| Review | The Verge | |||
Windows Phone 7 |
||||
| Model | Lumia 900 | |||
| Manufacturer | Nokia | Moving to the WP7 platform was the best move Nokia could do, it enables them to produce stunning hardware like the Lumia series without having to try to keep up on the OS front. The 900 adds LTE support for american 4G networks. | ||
| Screen Size | 4.3 inches | |||
| Processor | 1.4Ghz 1 Core | |||
| Storage | 16GB | |||
| Memory | 512mb | |||
| OS | WP7 7.5 | |||
| Key Feature | Excellent build quality and stunning looks | |||
| Availability | Q3/Q4 2012 | |||
| Price | Less than $300 | |||
| Review | The Verge | |||
| Model | Titan II | |||
| Manufacturer | HTC | HTC builds on it’s winning formula of solid build quality and good screens – like most of the WP7 phones on display this adds LTE support. | ||
| Screen Size | 4.7 inches | |||
| Processor | 1.5Ghz 1 Core | |||
| Storage | 16GB | |||
| Memory | 1GB | |||
| OS | WP7 7.5 | |||
| Key Feature | 16mp camera and dual flash | |||
| Availability | Q2/Q3 2012 | |||
| Price | Less than $200 | |||
| Review | The Verge | |||
It’s all pretty much of a muchness to be honest. The Android manufacturers are just adding more processor power, presumably until eventually the American Army buys 1000 of them and creates a super computer with a $20 a month contract. The WP7 phones were pretty much just adding LTE support. Now I know some of the omissions can be blamed on the current state of the OS. WP7 still hasn’t got support for different resolutions or proper external memory support. Android is in a transference state onto 4.0, a move which will hopefully bring some more stability with it.
So, who was the mobile phone winner at CES 2012? Both Android and WP7 showed off some nice kit. It may not have been radical but it was solid and for the most part nicely designed. The new mobile screens are uniformly gorgeous and bright. But no, neither Android nor WP7 won CES for me. If I had to pick a winner then i’d pick Intel.
From being left out in the cold in the Mobile Phone wars for the last few years they’ve now come back and had 3 big name manufacturers announcing medfield based phones. They demonstrated both ability in performance and energy saving that was at least on par with the best ARM based solutions available.
I’m looking forward to seeing what happens in this space, it was interesting to note that the only medfield phones being shown were running Android 4.0 too, but I can’t believe that MS hasn’t got an x86 build of WP7 on the way.

